M.O.T.? Museum Of contemporary art Tokyo

The MOT museum, which I visited during the Tanaka Atsuko exhibition, was full of surprises. Rather dull surprises mostly, in the permanent exhibition; except the section which seemed intended to make the visitors believe that japanese painters invented dripping which was funny.

There was a part about Gutai which, if not enlightened me about what it was, at least interested me. Although of course I was almost bound to be interested because of the Tanaka exhibition and the perspective it seemed to give on Gutai revolution in art (in japan).

Many of their experiments seem to have been based on an exploitation of chance phenomena not unlike that of Dubuffet or Dada. Then again, their two precepts were:

1-do not copy others

2-be original

So if I am able to compare Dada and Gutai (a book would do it for me, for example the french http://www.amazon.fr/Dada-au-Japon-Marc-Dachy/dp/2130519784 ) there is a paradox. How does Gutai define copying?

If copying the anarchist precepts of Dada makes originality possible, let’s not be too hard on these guys; they were sincere. Although i did not take pictures of Tanaka’s famous electric dress or of her viewer-generated (interactivity domine) ringing bells installation, I was glad to discover her etching talent. The exhibition is called “the art of connecting”; it draws interesting links between her graphic language (based on dots and dripping lines) and her electric installations.
Let me draw a link between this practice an that of her contemporary, Kusama Yayoi (the “pink” picture).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s